11/9 AUTOPSIE DES TERRORISMES

This collection of interviews with Noam Chomsky, published shortly after the September 11 attacks, is praised for its immediate and insightful contextualization of the events. Reviewers highlight Chomsky's ability to offer a counter-narrative to the prevailing sentiment of the time, challenging the notion of American innocence and advocating for a more nuanced approach to foreign policy. Many found the book effective in popularizing Chomsky's core views, urging readers to consider all lives and nations as equally valuable, and to critically examine historical instances of United States foreign policy. It is commended for its sharp-sighted analysis, drawing on historical facts to argue against excessive military rhetoric and to illuminate what some describe as a "moral blindness" in international relations. The book is seen as brave and prescient, with many finding Chomsky's predictions and critique of the post-9/11 response to be remarkably accurate years later.

However, some readers found the book to be repetitive, a common criticism for collections of interviews that cover similar ground. For those already familiar with Chomsky's extensive body of work, the book may not offer much new information, serving more as an introduction or summary of his established positions. A number of critics strongly disagreed with Chomsky's central assertion that the United States is a leading terrorist state, finding such claims inappropriate and inflammatory, especially in the immediate aftermath of the attacks. Some reviews also characterize his writing style as overly negative, tedious, or even "ranting," suggesting a perceived bias in his presentation of historical events and a dismissal of alternative viewpoints. A few also wished he had addressed certain alternative theories regarding the 9/11 events themselves.

Overall, this book is recommended for readers seeking a critical and alternative perspective on the September 11 attacks and the subsequent "War on Terror." It is particularly well-suited for students of sociology, political science, or anyone interested in a deep, historical analysis of United States foreign policy and its ethical implications. While some may find its arguments challenging or its style repetitive, it is widely acknowledged for its intellectual rigor and its capacity to provoke thought, making it a valuable read for those willing to engage with a viewpoint decidedly different from mainstream media narratives.