1821 η δημιουργία ενός έθνους-κράτους

This book is widely commended for offering a fresh, objective, and authoritative perspective on the Greek Revolution, successfully moving beyond conventional national myths. Reviewers praise its thorough depiction of the social and political processes of the era, as well as the diverse motivations of the individuals involved. A key strength is the authors' judicious use of abundant excerpts from primary sources, which allows the voices of the historical protagonists to directly inform the narrative. Specific chapters, particularly those detailing the conditions leading to the revolution and the establishment of the Filiki Eteria, are highlighted for their insightful content and clear presentation. The book is generally found to be accessible in its language and structure, making complex historical themes understandable.

However, some readers note certain limitations. The book is described as occasionally fragmented and overly concise on particular subjects, with some fundamental historical facts or important figures either omitted or introduced without sufficient contextual explanation. For example, a major historical event like the Battle of Navarino receives only a brief mention, and the precise timeline for Greece's autonomy and subsequent independence is not always clearly delineated. One chapter concerning the formation of central authority is specifically mentioned as being dry and at times confusing, with a perceived overreliance on direct primary source quotations rather than the authors' own analytical synthesis.

Overall, the book is considered a valuable, albeit relatively concise, contribution to the historiography of the Greek Revolution, offering a nuanced and well-researched viewpoint. It is particularly recommended for readers who already possess a foundational knowledge of the period and seek to explore its complexities more deeply, challenging established narratives and gaining new insights. This book is ideal for those who desire to understand the era and its key figures from a critical, evidence-based standpoint, rather than simply reaffirming existing national or ideological perspectives.