Positives The book is widely praised as an exceptional and indispensable reference for Ottoman history, offering a comprehensive overview of the period. Reviewers highlight its unique structure, presenting 303 selected questions from a larger pool, covering political, economic, social, and legal aspects of the Ottoman Empire. The author's scientific approach, logical language, and extensive reliance on documented sources, including Islamic, Western, and even critical Orientalist texts, are consistently lauded. Many found the book's answers to be clear, detailed, and definitive, effectively addressing historical accusations and doubts. Despite its considerable length, often exceeding 700 pages, the question-and-answer format is commended for making the reading engaging and preventing monotony, allowing readers to easily navigate to topics of interest. The author's expertise as a Turkish professor specializing in Ottoman history and his fluency in relevant languages lend a high degree of credibility and trustworthiness to the information presented.
Negatives Despite its strengths, some reviewers noted certain drawbacks. A recurring criticism points to a perceived tendency by the author to excuse or over-praise rulers and sultans, often attributing successes solely to them while shifting blame for failures onto subordinates. This approach, which some describe as a hagiographic or religiously biased perspective, occasionally leads to justifications that are considered strained, forced, or even historically disputed by some critics regarding the personal conduct of some rulers or the reasoning behind certain historical conflicts. Additionally, a few reviewers mentioned the presence of some typographical errors and occasional repetition of information, which is an inherent challenge of the question-and-answer format when similar topics arise in different sections. One review also suggested that the book might be perceived as primarily serving to reinforce the views of Ottoman supporters, rather than maintaining strict neutrality throughout.
Conclusion Overall, the book is considered a significant and valuable contribution to the study of Ottoman history, capable of transforming a reader's understanding of the era. While it aims for objectivity and provides extensive documentation to challenge misconceptions and offer nuanced explanations of complex historical events, readers should be aware of the occasional apologetic leanings noted by some. It is highly recommended as a primary reference for researchers, students, and anyone with a keen interest in Ottoman history, particularly those seeking detailed answers to frequently asked questions and a deeper insight into the empire's political, social, and economic structures. However, due to its depth and Q&A format, it might be more beneficial for readers who already possess some foundational knowledge of the period, rather than serving as a first introduction to the subject.