Andrum om stölden av en flyktingkris och om de bestulna

The book "Andrum" is praised for its detailed exploration of Swedish immigration policy and public debate during 2015-2016, effectively demonstrating the consequences of significant changes in asylum policy. The author, a lawyer, skillfully interweaves precise accounts of relevant laws and facts with compelling stories of real individuals, illustrating the human impact of these legal frameworks. Reviewers appreciate the book's ability to summarize crucial laws and conventions governing asylum rights in Sweden, offering practical insights into the asylum application process, including both its human and legal dimensions.

However, the review points out a notable concern regarding the author's lack of consistent objectivity. The author is criticized for sometimes presenting personal feelings as arguments without sufficient factual basis, and for instances of what is perceived as unprofessional conduct, such as personal charitable acts detailed within the narrative. The reviewer argues that as a legal professional, the author should maintain a more nuanced and objective stance, providing assertions with clear legal backing. Additionally, the book is noted for its strong critique of how asylum law has been reshaped, but it is also criticized for not offering concrete suggestions or improvement proposals for the system, despite the author's extensive experience.

Despite these reservations, "Andrum" is ultimately deemed a readable and valuable book. It is best understood as a well-substantiated contribution to the ongoing debate on refugee issues, rather than a strictly objective legal analysis. This book would particularly appeal to readers interested in understanding the intricacies of Swedish asylum law, the practicalities of the asylum process, and the profound human consequences of policy shifts, especially those who welcome a critical perspective on these developments.