Blood and Belief

The book is widely lauded as a significant and comprehensive contribution to the limited scholarship on Kurdish nationalism and the PKK. Reviewers praise its long-term historical perspective, offering invaluable context to the emergence of Kurdish nationalist groups in Turkey and the broader region. It is noted for its extensive research, drawing heavily on interviews with former and current PKK members, activists, military officials, and journalists, which provides a deeply personal and moving insight into the lives and motivations of those involved. Readers appreciate its objective approach, presenting a nuanced view that is sympathetic to Kurdish aspirations while avoiding clichés. The book is commended for simplifying a complex history of alliances and power dynamics, making it accessible even to those unfamiliar with the subject, and for its critical yet balanced portrayal of the PKK's origins and growth.

However, the book also draws several criticisms. A recurring point is its dated nature, published in 2007, meaning it does not cover more recent ideological shifts within the PKK or later developments in the region. Some reviewers feel that a significant portion of the book focuses too heavily on a psychological analysis of Abdullah Ocalan, presenting an "anti-Apo" view and potentially overshadowing a broader historical scope suggested by the title. Concerns are raised about the potential bias of the sources, as many interviews are with former PKK members, with one reviewer specifically questioning the author's reliance on individuals perceived as government spies or "fascist" journalists. Other criticisms include a perceived lack of depth in analyzing the wider Turkish political situation, a somewhat hurried ending, and an occasional failure to fully appreciate the specific cultural and historical context of the region from a Western perspective.

Despite these criticisms, the consensus is that the book remains a highly valuable and often definitive history of the PKK, particularly its formative years. It is recognized for its objective, "warts and all" account of the organization's birth and growth, effectively illustrating how it became a popular force fighting for Kurdish rights despite internal authoritarian practices. The book is highly recommended for researchers, scholars, and general readers interested in gaining a thorough understanding of the PKK, the Kurdish struggle for self-determination, and the tragic complexities of the Turkish-Kurdish relationship. While acknowledging its limitations regarding more recent events, it is considered an essential and engaging read for anyone seeking a foundational and critical overview of this significant subject.