Positives The reviews highlight this book as an excellent resource for understanding Noam Chomsky's foundational work in linguistics, particularly his pursuit of Generative Grammar. Readers praise its ability to illuminate the historical roots of modern linguistic and cognitive science, drawing compelling parallels between Chomsky's ideas and the rationalist tradition stretching back to Descartes and the 17th-century Port-Royal grammarians. The book is lauded for revealing and discussing often-overlooked historical texts and figures, showcasing Chomsky's scholarship as an intellectual historian. It presents a unified and powerful argument for the innateness of language, emphasizing the creative aspect of language use and the concept of Universal Grammar. Reviewers also appreciate its exploration of the "poverty of stimulus" argument and the distinction between deep and surface linguistic structures. The book is seen as a crucial text that propelled the field of linguistics forward, offering important insights into how human freedom is deeply intertwined with human knowledge, and even anticipating later developments in pragmatics and semantics.
Negatives However, the book is not without its criticisms. Several reviewers note that engaging with its profundities often presupposes a significant familiarity with rationalist philosophy, particularly Descartes, and the Port-Royal philosophy of grammar. Older editions are frequently criticized for including lengthy, untranslated passages in French and German, posing a considerable challenge even for advanced readers. Some critics find Chomsky's approach in the book to be pompous, arguing that his interpretations of historical figures like Humboldt are misreadings or even "academic piracy," particularly regarding the Port-Royal grammarians' original intent. Concerns are raised that the underlying assumptions of the Cartesian program, as presented, may not be entirely valid or justified by their historical sources. Additionally, Chomsky's emphasis on language primarily as an organ of thought, downplaying its sociocultural and communicative aspects, is viewed by some as an oversimplification that limits the scope of linguistic inquiry.
Conclusion Despite these reservations, the general consensus is that this is a significant and influential work, offering a unique and often compelling perspective on the intellectual history of language. It is considered a foundational text for anyone seeking to understand Chomsky's intellectual project and the rationalist tradition within linguistics, with many reviewers acknowledging its lasting impact and the "timelessness" of its core arguments. The book is highly recommended for students of linguistics and cognitive science, particularly those interested in the relationship between language and mind, and the philosophical underpinnings of linguistic theory. It is especially valuable for readers who wish to trace the historical development of ideas that led to the Chomskyan enterprise, offering a clear, concise, and engaging overview for those with at least a slight background in either linguistics or Cartesian philosophy.
