Cirkin Ask

Many readers found the book to be a deeply emotional and compelling experience, often leading to tears and a lasting impression. They praised the author's ability to create a unique and powerful story with well-developed, passionate connections between characters. The male protagonist, Miles, was frequently described as intriguing and enigmatic, with a complex and tragic backstory that effectively explains his aversion to love. The dual perspective narrative, alternating between the female protagonist's present and Miles' past, was often lauded for its skillful revelation of the story, slowly piecing together the reasons behind his pain. Intimate scenes were noted for their intensity and passion, contributing to the book's steamy reputation. Reviewers also appreciated the overarching message about the healing power of love and finding beauty even in its "ugly" aspects. Supporting characters, such as the female protagonist's brother and another older character, were often highlighted as enjoyable additions.

Conversely, a significant portion of readers expressed strong criticisms, primarily focusing on the characters and their relationship dynamics. The female protagonist, Tate, was often perceived as a "doormat," lacking self-respect and being excessively forgiving of Miles' actions, which many found to be disrespectful and emotionally abusive. Miles himself was frequently criticized for his cruel treatment, manipulative behavior, and a perceived lack of genuine remorse or "groveling" for his mistakes. This led many to label the central relationship as unhealthy and even toxic, offering problematic messages about love. A major point of contention was the writing style in Miles' flashback chapters, described by some as juvenile, repetitive, "purple prose," and inauthentic for an 18-year-old male, making it a "chore to read." Additionally, some reviewers felt Miles' past relationship overshadowed the present one, and the overall plot was deemed unoriginal or reliant on clichés.

Overall, the reviews indicate a highly divisive book that elicits strong emotional responses, both positive and negative. While some readers were captivated by the raw emotion, the intricate unraveling of a character's painful past, and the intense, steamy romance, others were alienated by the perceived unhealthy relationship dynamics, the female protagonist's lack of agency, and a specific narrative style. This book would likely appeal to readers who enjoy emotionally intense stories with morally complex characters and a focus on overcoming past trauma, even if it involves flawed or challenging relationship portrayals. However, readers seeking healthy relationship models, strong and assertive female leads, or a more conventional, straightforward prose style may find it frustrating or disappointing.