Drie oorlogen

Readers largely praise the book for its clear, factual, and often humorous account of the First World War, Second World War, and the Cold War. Many found it highly engaging and educational, appreciating the author's characteristic no-nonsense approach and accessible writing style, which makes it feel like a lecture in book form. The book is particularly commended for its excellent coherence, effectively connecting the three major conflicts and putting historical developments into perspective. While providing a sharp overview of the political and social impact, its true strength is often highlighted in the in-depth and extensive analysis of the Cold War, where the author's expertise shines. The ability to cover such vast historical periods in a concise manner is seen as a significant achievement, making it a great resource for understanding the big lines of 20th-century history.

However, some readers found the book challenging to get through, with one describing it as "a war in itself" due to its density. Several reviews mention that the chronological flow could be confusing, with dates and events sometimes feeling jumbled, leading to a loss of overview. A recurring criticism is the perceived lack of depth, particularly concerning the First and Second World Wars, which are often described as brief, superficial, and lacking new insights compared to the more comprehensive treatment of the Cold War. This has led some to question why the entire book wasn't dedicated to the Cold War. Additionally, a few readers noted the absence of visual aids like maps or images, which they felt would have enhanced understanding. Minor points of contention include occasional "what if" scenarios or remarks that some found distracting, and instances where names or events were mentioned without sufficient explanation.

Overall, the book is generally considered a valuable and accessible overview of the major 20th-century conflicts, particularly for those seeking to understand the interconnectedness of these events. It is highly recommended for readers interested in a broad, coherent narrative of modern history, presented with the author's distinctive voice and perspective. While it may not satisfy those looking for exhaustive detail or groundbreaking new research on the earlier wars, it excels as an introductory or refresher text. It is ideal for individuals who want to grasp the main historical developments and their context, or for those whose knowledge of the 20th century has faded, serving well as a concise reference work rather than a deep academic dive.