Eksperimentet der slog fejl

This book is widely praised by reviewers as a sober, nuanced, and well-written contribution to the ongoing debate about immigration in Denmark. Many commend its approach to describing immigration from non-Western countries as an experiment, arguing it encourages a more informed, constructive, and solution-oriented discussion, even when presenting "uncomfortable truths." Reviewers highlight the book's use of data and reports to back its arguments, deeming it a very necessary and relevant work that addresses what they consider a critical challenge facing Denmark and Europe. For several, it is considered a "must-read" for its vital insights.

However, some readers found the book less compelling, especially if they were already deeply familiar with the immigration debate. These reviewers noted a perceived lack of new insights or revelations, suggesting the content might not offer much fresh perspective for those who have followed the topic closely over the years. A few also criticized the writing style, describing it as uninspiring or lacking the intensity they might expect from such a crucial subject, even recommending other books for a more engaging experience. It was also suggested that the book might be primarily aimed at a general audience or policymakers, which could explain why some experienced readers found less personal value in it.

In conclusion, this book is a significant and relevant work that offers a challenging perspective on immigration policies and their societal impact. It is likely to be particularly valuable for readers who are new to the complexities of the immigration debate, or for policymakers seeking a comprehensive and thought-provoking analysis. While those already well-versed in the subject might find some of its content less novel, the book is generally considered an important and necessary read for anyone interested in a data-driven and critical examination of immigration in Denmark and its broader European implications.