En dan nog iets...

Readers generally praise this book for its ability to provide more time with beloved characters and offer an entertaining, often funny, reading experience. Many appreciate Eoin Colfer's effort to capture the spirit and feel of the original series, with some finding it an amusing romp that helps to alleviate the lingering aftertaste of the previous installment's ending. The author's clear appreciation for the Hitchhiker's universe is noted, and some reviewers found the inclusion of familiar elements, new characters, and humorous dialogue to be a decent imitation of Douglas Adams' style. The approval of Adams' widow is also often cited as a positive indicator of the book's legitimacy as a continuation.

However, a significant portion of the reviews express disappointment, finding the book unmemorable, dull, or simply not on par with Adams' work. Criticisms frequently target the writing style, describing it as shallow, immature, or clunky, often resembling amateur fan fiction rather than the sharp wit of the original author. The Guide entries, a hallmark of the series, are often cited as excessive, forced, and disruptive to the narrative flow. Characterizations are another common point of contention, with some readers feeling that familiar personalities are inconsistently portrayed or reduced to caricatures. The plot is sometimes deemed unnecessary, directionless, or repetitive, failing to add substantial value to the established universe.

Overall, the book receives a mixed reception, often viewed as a decent but not exceptional attempt to extend a cherished series. It is best approached by dedicated fans of the Hitchhiker's Guide who are curious for more adventures with the crew and are willing to accept stylistic differences and potential inconsistencies. Readers who go in expecting a lighthearted homage and an entertaining romp are more likely to enjoy it, while those seeking the profound wit, tight narrative, and unique voice of Douglas Adams may find themselves underwhelmed or even disappointed, seeing it as an unnecessary postscript rather than an essential addition.