En defensa de la Ilustración

Steven Pinker's "Enlightenment Now" is widely praised for its comprehensive and meticulously researched argument asserting that humanity has made astounding progress across a multitude of measurable indicators. Reviewers highlight the book's deep dive into data, presenting a compelling and accessible picture of how and why life has significantly improved in areas such as health, wealth, safety, education, peace, and overall quality of life. Many found it an inspiring and uplifting read that challenges the pervasive narrative of decline often found in news cycles. The book is lauded for its defense of Enlightenment ideals - reason, science, and humanism - and its ability to articulate a case for progress in a fresh, engaging manner, often encouraging readers to reconsider their own pessimistic assumptions.

However, the book also faces substantial criticism, with many reviewers finding it overly optimistic and selective in its use of data. Critics accuse Pinker of cherry-picking information, misrepresenting sources, and ignoring inconvenient facts or countries that do not fit his narrative. Specific concerns include the book's dismissal of environmental issues, its perceived downplaying of economic inequality and the suffering of people in certain labor conditions, and its generalized comparisons of living costs that neglect modern expenses. Some reviewers found the tone arrogant or condescending towards those who express concerns about societal problems, labeling them as anti-Enlightenment. Others argue that Pinker, a linguist and cognitive psychologist, oversteps his expertise in various fields and fails to adequately address the risks of catastrophic global events or the unquantifiable aspects of human flourishing.

Ultimately, "Enlightenment Now" is a polarizing book, sparking strong reactions from both admirers and detractors. While some hail it as an essential, thought-provoking work that profoundly shifts perspectives on human progress, others dismiss it as intellectually flawed, repetitive, or a biased defense of the status quo. The book would likely appeal to readers who are open to a data-driven, optimistic view of the world and a vigorous defense of Enlightenment principles, particularly those who feel overwhelmed by negative news and seek a counter-narrative. Conversely, readers who prefer a more critical analysis of societal problems, are skeptical of broad generalizations, or are inclined towards alternative economic and philosophical viewpoints might find it challenging and potentially frustrating, advocating for a critical approach and perhaps reading it alongside diverse perspectives.