Falshivaia istoriia Velikoi voiny

The book is praised for its comprehensive debunking of various Russian historical narratives concerning the Second World War, often from a specific revisionist viewpoint. Reviewers found it entertaining at times, offering a deep dive into some of the more elaborate or unusual historical theories propagated in Russia. A significant strength highlighted is an extensive chapter dedicated to contemporary propaganda surrounding repressions against Poles, including attempts to distort historical facts. One reviewer simply hailed the book as "very good," suggesting it provides a valuable counter-narrative to prevalent historical falsehoods.

Despite its strengths, the book is criticized for lacking a clear central thesis or overarching theme, instead presenting as a collection of individual debunking texts. A common complaint is that much of the content involves a tedious dissection of numbers, stylistic choices, and even minor errors in other works. This detailed, point-by-point refutation style can make the book dry and boring for many readers, with one reviewer likening it to the argumentative exchanges found on online historical forums.

In summary, the book offers a detailed and often critical examination of certain historical interpretations, particularly regarding World War II and Polish-Russian relations. While it excels at meticulously dismantling specific historical claims and providing alternative perspectives, its argumentative, detail-heavy approach means it may not appeal to everyone. This book would be best suited for readers with a strong interest in the historiography of World War II, those specifically looking to explore alternative or revisionist viewpoints on Russian historical narratives, and individuals who appreciate a forensic, argumentative style of historical analysis.