Five Days at Memorial Life and Death in a Storm-ravaged Hospital

Reviewers widely commend the book for its extensive research and detailed account of the events at Memorial Hospital following Hurricane Katrina. Many found the narrative to be gripping, compelling, and harrowing, effectively exploring the complex ethical dilemmas faced by medical staff under extreme conditions. The book is frequently praised for its ability to provoke thought and stimulate important discussions on disaster preparedness, moral decision-making, and the systemic failures that contributed to the crisis. Its thoroughness and the author's background are often highlighted as strengths that lend credibility to the investigation.

However, a significant point of contention among readers is the author's perceived lack of neutrality. A considerable number of reviewers argue that the book exhibits a clear bias, particularly in its portrayal of certain individuals and the legal proceedings that followed. Critics also found the narrative to be repetitive, especially in its second half which details the investigation, leading some to describe it as dragging or dull. Other concerns include the book's considerable length, an overwhelming number of characters to track, and the inclusion of seemingly extraneous issues that some felt detracted from the core narrative. Additionally, some readers expressed disapproval of the author's public behavior or promotional activities, viewing them as inappropriate given the tragic subject matter.

Despite these criticisms, the book is broadly regarded as an important and thought-provoking read that offers a complex, nuanced examination of human behavior and institutional failures during a severe crisis. It challenges readers to consider difficult questions about responsibility, triage in limited resource environments, and end-of-life care under unprecedented circumstances. This book is highly recommended for healthcare professionals, first responders, those interested in medical ethics or bioethics, and anyone who appreciates in-depth investigative journalism or narrative nonfiction focusing on real-life disasters. Its capacity to spark intense debate also makes it a strong choice for book clubs.