Het land achter de heuvels politiek als ambacht, 1968-2018

The book is widely lauded for its engaging and fluent writing style, offering a solid and honest window into the world of politics from various functions and positions. Readers particularly appreciate the personal sections, which provide valuable insights into how the author's history and experiences shaped his actions, often evoking emotional responses such as laughter and tears. It is praised as a multi-faceted work, capable of being read as a historical account of a significant administrator, a personal journey, a witness account of a changing political system, and even a practical guide to governance. The portrayal of his time in local politics, especially in Groningen, is highlighted as particularly captivating, bringing political dilemmas to life in a relatable way.

Despite its strengths, some reviewers note certain limitations. While the author demonstrates a strong understanding of constitutional relations between the cabinet and parliament, critics perceive an inconsistency in applying this same sensitivity to his role as a faction leader, suggesting he operated more as a "chief whip" for his party leader. A significant point of contention is the book's perceived omission of deeper reflection on pivotal ideological shifts within his party, specifically the "shaking off of ideological feathers." Reviewers also feel that while the author rightly expresses concern for the state of democracy, he largely avoids a comprehensive discussion on the current state of socialism following a period of "Third Way" politics, leading to the impression that he remains the "ideal second man" by refraining from public criticism of his former leader.

Overall, the book is considered an inspiring and valuable addition to Dutch political literature, particularly given the scarcity of political autobiographies in the Netherlands. It offers a unique and intimate perspective on political life, effectively balancing personal narrative with observations on governance. This book would strongly appeal to readers interested in Dutch political history, especially the dynamics of local and national administration, and those who appreciate personal reflections on public service. It is also well-suited for individuals seeking insights into the practicalities of governing and the personal journey of a significant political figure, provided they are open to an account that might leave some ideological questions unanswered.