La malédiction des Kennedy

Many readers found "The Kennedy Curse" to be an intriguing and entertaining read, offering a fascinating glimpse into the lives of the Kennedy family. Reviewers appreciated learning new details about their history, including their Irish roots and political ascent, which some found truly captivating. The book is acknowledged for its extensive research, drawing from a wide variety of sources and interviews, and presenting a basic timeline of events. Some readers noted the author's ability to dissect human relationships and offer psychological insights into the family's self-destructive behaviors, attributing misfortunes to hubris, narcissism, and a propensity for risk-taking. For those new to the subject, the book serves as an accessible introduction to the family's complex story and their resilience in the face of numerous challenges.

Despite its strengths, the book draws considerable criticism for its perceived lack of credibility and sensationalist approach. Many reviewers describe it as biased, gossipy, and tabloid-style, questioning its classification as non-fiction due to reliance on hearsay, speculation, and anonymous sources. Critics frequently point out significant omissions, particularly the lack of in-depth coverage on key family members and major historical events. The central premise of a "curse" is often seen as a gimmick, with the author failing to convincingly prove his thesis and instead attributing events to poor choices or psychological traits rather than a mystical curse. Furthermore, the book is criticized for its repetitive arguments, factual errors, and a tendency towards "pop-psychology" with interpretations from experts who never met the subjects. Some found the tone to be negative and depressing, lacking any sense of resolution or hope, and containing misogynistic elements in its portrayal of female figures.

Overall, "The Kennedy Curse" is a polarizing read. While it offers an interesting narrative for those unfamiliar with the Kennedy family's history, its sensationalist tone and analytical shortcomings make it less appealing for readers seeking a rigorous, unbiased account. It is recommended for individuals with a casual interest in the Kennedy family saga, particularly those curious about the psychological underpinnings of their public and private lives, and readers who enjoy a dramatic, personality-driven historical narrative. However, those looking for a scholarly historical analysis, a deep exploration of generational curses, or a balanced portrayal of the family's achievements alongside their struggles, may find this book disappointing due to its perceived bias, omissions, and speculative nature.