L'art de marcher

Rebecca Solnit's book is widely praised for its expansive and erudite exploration of walking, drawing from a vast array of disciplines including history, literature, philosophy, politics, and social commentary. Reviewers appreciated its thought-provoking insights into how walking has shaped human culture, individual experience, and public space. Many found the discussions on walking as a political and feminist act, its role in meditation and rumination, and its connection to environmentalism particularly compelling. The book's ability to weave together diverse topics, from the origins of bipedalism to the development of gardens and protest marches, was frequently highlighted as a strength, offering readers a deeper and more nuanced understanding of an everyday activity. Specific chapters on the history of nature walks, the politics of public space, and the experiences of women walkers were often cited as engaging and illuminating.

However, the book also drew criticism for its lack of a cohesive structure, often feeling more like a collection of musings and digressions rather than a straightforward history. Some readers found the prose dense and dry, making it a challenging read to get through. A significant point of contention was the book's predominantly Western-centric perspective, with many reviewers noting the absence of non-Western examples and a perceived superficiality in addressing issues of race, class, and disability. The author's personal anecdotes, while present, were sometimes described as lacking depth or connection to the broader themes, and her critical stance on suburban life and modern technology was occasionally seen as classist or overly opinionated. The book's age also meant some discussions felt dated, lacking references to more contemporary developments or figures in the discourse of walking.

Overall, the book presents a rich but uneven intellectual journey into the act of walking. It is best suited for readers who appreciate an ambitious, interdisciplinary, and philosophical approach to non-fiction and are open to a discursive style rather than a strict chronological history. Those interested in the cultural, social, and political dimensions of walking, and who enjoy exploring varied perspectives on a single theme, will likely find much to ponder. However, readers seeking a linear narrative, a more global perspective, or a lighter, more personal exploration of walking may find it a demanding and occasionally frustrating experience.