Positives The provided review does not explicitly highlight any positive aspects of the book. It describes the book as a "fairly typical Latin book," which might suggest adherence to established conventions within this genre, though the reviewer immediately follows this observation with criticisms.
Negatives The primary criticisms leveled against the book focus on its pedagogical approach. The reviewer identifies a "traditionalist" and "pedagogically bad" grammar-translation methodology. Additionally, the book is criticized for what the reviewer terms "ancestor worship of clueless ancient philosophers." The overall sentiment is strongly negative, with the reviewer concluding the book is "just awful" and advising readers to "avoid" it.
Conclusion Based on this review, the book receives a resoundingly negative verdict due to its perceived outdated teaching methods and uncritical presentation of ancient figures. It would likely appeal least to readers seeking modern, effective pedagogical techniques for learning Latin or a more critical engagement with historical philosophy. Conversely, it might only find an audience among those who specifically prefer or are accustomed to a highly traditional, grammar-translation style of instruction and a less critical, more reverential approach to ancient philosophical texts.
