Reviewers found the book to be an interesting and exciting read, particularly for those curious about the subject. Many noted that it offered an engaging perspective on the individual, making it a compelling read regardless of one's political leanings. It is described as a portrait of the person, which some found intriguing.
Disliked
However, a significant criticism across reviews is the book's perceived lack of new information, with many stating that it presents little that wasn't already known or discussed in the media. The portrayal of the subject is consistently described as very dark, cynical, and at times condescending, focusing almost exclusively on negative aspects of their actions and character. Some felt the depiction was unilaterally negative, portraying the individual as manipulative, exploitative, and deceitful. Additionally, the book's concluding remarks were seen by some as unoriginal or lacking depth.
In short
In summary, while the book provides an interesting and engaging, albeit dark, portrait of its subject, it generally fails to offer fresh revelations. It is best suited for readers who are interested in a critical and unvarnished character study, particularly those who appreciate a narrative that highlights perceived flaws and controversial actions, and are not necessarily looking for new, groundbreaking information.
Danmarks folkesagn: deel. Sagn om naturgienstande: Om søer, bundløse kiæer, aaer og fiorde. Sagn om kilder. Sandbakker, huler og kaempestene. Skove, tTræer og afsviet græs. Om pesten. Om rotter. Sagn om det overnaturlige: Fanden. Om hexe og deslige. Sagn om adskilligt gienfærd. Troldfolket. Efterslæt