Lumea secretă a nomenclaturii amintiri, dezvăluiri, portrete

The book is praised for offering a unique glimpse into the less-known world of the communist elite, or nomenklatura. Reviewers highlight the author's distinct advantage of having grown up within this privileged environment, which provides an insider's perspective on the establishment of communism and the intricate connections among the party elite. The tone is often described as balanced, measured, and open, contributing to an exceptionally interesting read for those keen on understanding the era. Some appreciate the narrative's rhythm, fluency, and the author's incisive judgment of historical figures. It is also seen as a valuable volume of information, offering new details about the period.

Conversely, several reviews express significant reservations. Critics point out that large sections of the book appear dedicated to the exoneration of the author's parents and complaints about their perceived suffering, despite their continued enjoyment of substantial privileges within the regime. The writing style is frequently criticized as being overly detailed and bogged down by a multitude of names, resulting in poor storytelling and a "fog of words" that obscures any new insights into the "secret world of nomenclature." Many found the content largely boring, with little "secret" or "juicy" information, leading some to deem the title misleading. The book is described as reading like a "tangled gossip" with repetitive and poorly structured information, and some felt it was a missed opportunity to discuss more significant figures or events.

Ultimately, this book elicits strong and varied reactions, making it a polarizing read. While some readers will appreciate the author's personal account and unique vantage point into the communist elite, especially those interested in the social dynamics and internal workings of the nomenklatura, others may find it self-serving, tedious, and lacking in fresh revelations. It is best suited for readers who are prepared for a memoir-like narrative and a subjective exploration of a specific social stratum during the communist era, rather than an objective historical analysis or a discovery of deep, previously unknown secrets. Those seeking a straightforward, well-structured historical text or expecting sensational disclosures might be left disappointed.