Lwów--kres iluzji opowieść o pogromie listopadowym 1918

The book is widely praised for its meticulous and thorough research, drawing extensively from original reports, testimonies, and diaries to reconstruct a challenging historical event. Reviewers commend the author's systematic approach to facts and arguments, often attributing this strength to his legal background. The work is seen as a courageous act of patriotism, unafraid to expose uncomfortable truths and challenge deeply ingrained national myths, particularly concerning the perception of "heroic liberation" in Lviv. Many appreciate its unembellished account of the 1918 events, highlighting its accessible language and logical structure, which also provide broader historical context on similar violence in Eastern Europe. Overall, the book is considered an essential text for those seeking a deeper understanding of national history and confronting past responsibilities.

Despite its strengths, the book faces criticism for a perceived lack of objectivity, with some reviewers suggesting it is written with a predetermined thesis. Critics argue that the author does not always adequately prove his central arguments and is seen as overlooking crucial historical context, such as the widespread regional violence, the demoralizing effects of war, and specific conditions in Lviv at the time. Concerns are also raised about the author's dismissal of certain facts, like diplomatic reports questioning the use of the term "pogrom," without sufficient counter-argument. Some find certain generalizations to be unsupported by evidence and note omissions, such as a lack of detailed explanation regarding different local communities. Additionally, a practical criticism is the absence of a city map, which could enhance reader comprehension.

Ultimately, the book is described as an impactful and thought-provoking work that compels readers to confront difficult historical realities and engage in a discourse about national responsibility. It is recommended for individuals seeking an unvarnished understanding of a complex historical event and who possess the courage to examine challenging aspects of national narratives. While lauded by many for its bravery and detailed presentation, potential readers should be aware of the criticisms regarding its historical contextualization and perceived ideological leanings. This book is particularly suited for those interested in challenging established narratives, exploring the multifaceted nature of ethnic violence, and considering the enduring implications of unaddressed historical injustices.