Mawsūʻat al-ʻunf fī al-ḥarakāt al-Islāmīyah al-musallaḥah: 50 ʻāman min al-dam

Readers praise the book as an important historical document, particularly for those interested in the history of Islamic groups in Egypt. It is described as an exhaustive "encyclopedia" that meticulously covers a significant and turbulent decade from the 1970s to the early 1980s, focusing on well-known cases. The author, a prominent lawyer, is commended for his objectivity and integrity in presenting these complex issues without apparent bias. The book also provides valuable insights into the ideas and convictions of key figures involved, raises important lingering questions about the period, and for some, effectively sheds light on the nature of various groups and the vast differences in their interpretations of religious texts.

Conversely, some readers express disappointment, finding the book to be very large but with surprisingly sparse or unoriginal content. A common criticism is that a significant portion of the book consists of extensive investigation transcripts and witness statements, which some found repetitive or lacking in purpose, overshadowing deeper analysis of the events. There is also a strong critique regarding the author's perceived bias, with one reviewer accusing him of making excuses for certain groups despite a stated detachment. The grand title of the book, for some, creates an expectation of profound new insights that the content ultimately fails to deliver.

In conclusion, this book appears to be a valuable historical document for specialists and readers deeply invested in the history of Islamic political groups, particularly in Egypt during the 1970s and early 1980s. Its strength lies in its extensive compilation of primary source material, offering a factual, albeit often raw, account of significant events and the perspectives of those involved. However, general readers or those seeking a concise, highly analytical narrative might find the detailed transcripts overwhelming and the content somewhat repetitive. It is best suited for researchers and dedicated students who appreciate an unembellished, documentary-style presentation of historical records, and who can draw their own conclusions from the multitude of voices and interpretations presented.