Just after midnight, a snowdrift halts the glamorous Orient Express in its tracks. The train is unusually full for the time of year, but by morning, there is one passenger fewer. An American millionaire lies dead in his locked compartment, stabbed multiple times. With the train isolated by the snow, the murderer must be one of the passengers, and celebrated detective Hercule Poirot, who happens to be on board, is tasked with solving the crime.
Every passenger aboard the elegant train is a suspect, each with a secret to protect. As Poirot begins his investigation, he confronts a web of conflicting clues and deceptive testimonies from a diverse cast of international travelers. Confined by the snow and with a killer in their midst, Poirot must unravel one of the most ingenious plots ever devised, a case that will challenge his understanding of justice and force him to confront a conclusion that is as shocking as it is brilliant.
The chill of a winter's morning in Syria gives way to the plush warmth of the Taurus Express, carrying the esteemed Hercule Poirot towards Stamboul. A nagging premonition, a sense of unease, shadows his journey, even amidst the exotic landscapes. In Stamboul, a telegram summons him back to London, urging him to secure a berth on the famed Orient Express. Fortune, or perhaps fate, intervenes, and his old friend, Monsieur Bouc, director of the Compagnie Internationale des Wagons-Lits, finds him a place in the Calais coach, though the train is unusually full for the season.
As the luxurious train glides through the snow-laden landscapes of Yugoslavia, an American businessman named Samuel Ratchett approaches Poirot with an unsettling request: he believes his life is in danger and offers a substantial sum for protection. Poirot, however, finds Ratchett's countenance disagreeable and refuses his plea, stating simply, "I do not like your face." The train, a veritable microcosm of society, carries a diverse array of passengers, their lives intertwined in ways yet unknown, each with their own secrets and unspoken histories.
Just after midnight, the journey grinds to an abrupt halt. A heavy snowdrift has trapped the Orient Express in the desolate, mountainous Balkans. The silence of the snow-covered wilderness outside is soon shattered by a horrifying discovery within the Calais coach. Samuel Ratchett is found dead in his locked compartment, stabbed a dozen times, a brutal act committed with varying degrees of force, suggesting multiple assailants. The door, bolted from the inside, presents a classic locked-room mystery, ensuring that the murderer, or murderers, must still be among the stranded travelers.
With the world outside cut off by the relentless snow, Monsieur Bouc implores Poirot to take on the case, realizing that the reputation of the Orient Express is at stake. Poirot, ever the methodical detective, agrees. He begins his meticulous examination of the crime scene, noting peculiar details: a charred piece of paper with the name "Armstrong," a pipe cleaner, a lady's handkerchief, and a scarlet kimono. He soon uncovers Ratchett's true identity: Cassetti, a notorious criminal who had escaped justice years ago after orchestrating the kidnapping and murder of a young heiress, Daisy Armstrong, a tragedy that devastated her family and led to several suicides.
The investigation unfolds in a series of interviews, each passenger stepping forward with their carefully constructed alibis and tales. There is Hector MacQueen, Ratchett's anxious secretary; Edward Masterman, his prim valet; the flamboyant Mrs. Hubbard, a talkative American; the quiet Swedish missionary, Greta Ohlsson; the imperious Princess Dragomiroff and her maid, Hildegarde Schmidt; the aristocratic Count and Countess Andrenyi; the honorable Colonel Arbuthnot; the composed Mary Debenham; the Italian car salesman Antonio Foscarelli; and the private detective Cyrus Hardman, among others. Poirot listens, observes, and pieces together their stories, finding inconsistencies and strange connections that hint at a deeper, more complex conspiracy than a simple murder.
As Poirot delves deeper, a chilling pattern emerges. Each of the seemingly disparate passengers, he discovers, has a hidden connection to the tragic Armstrong case. They are relatives, friends, employees, or individuals whose lives were irrevocably shattered by Cassetti's heinous crime. The train, it becomes clear, is not merely a vessel of travel but a stage for a carefully orchestrated act of retribution. The varying stab wounds, the conflicting testimonies, the planted clues - all point to a collective effort.
Poirot gathers all the suspects in the dining car, presenting his findings. He outlines two possible solutions. The first, a simpler, more conventional explanation, suggests an unknown assailant slipped aboard, committed the murder, and then vanished. However, his "little grey cells" lead him to a far more extraordinary and morally complex truth: every single passenger in the Calais coach, excluding Monsieur Bouc and Dr. Constantine, was involved. They were all members of the Armstrong household or intimately connected to the family, each delivering a stab wound as an act of shared vengeance against the man who had escaped legal justice.
Faced with this revelation, a profound moral dilemma presents itself. Justice, in the eyes of the law, demands the apprehension of a single murderer. Yet, a deeper, more human form of justice has been served by this collective act. Poirot, acknowledging the unique circumstances and the suffering inflicted by Cassetti, chooses to present the simpler, fabricated solution to the Yugoslavian police, allowing the true perpetrators to escape the consequences of their actions, believing that some crimes demand an unconventional form of retribution. The train, once a symbol of escape and luxury, becomes a vessel of both a terrible crime and an extraordinary, shared redemption, leaving the great detective to ponder the intricate dance between law and morality.
What other readers say
Liked
Many reviewers praise this stage adaptation as a fun and engaging experience, highlighting its humor, suspense, and fast-paced nature. It is often seen as a good dramatization of the classic story, offering excellent opportunities for creative costume and set design. Some found it a wonderful piece to work with actors and students on characterization and structure, appreciating the playwright's work in bringing the story to the stage and finding it an impressive, cohesive yet true adaptation.
Disliked
However, other reviewers found the script to be lacking compared to the original book, describing it as rushed, shallow, wordy, and cumbersome. Criticisms include flat, stereotypical characters and jokes that fall flat or create an inconsistent tone, particularly when juxtaposed with the story's inherent moral dilemmas. Some noted that the mystery feels difficult to solve without prior knowledge and that the play demands a strong talent pool for accents and fine-tuned lighting due to quick scene shifts, making it challenging to produce effectively.
In short
Overall, this adaptation appears to be divisive. While some find it a great adaptation that successfully translates a beloved classic to the stage with a blend of drama and comedy, others feel it misses the mark, sacrificing depth for comedic elements and failing to live up to the source material. It would likely appeal to theatre-goers and producers looking for a play with significant visual and comedic potential, especially those who appreciate a more lighthearted take on a classic mystery. Conversely, purists of the original novel or those seeking a more serious and straightforward mystery might find it less satisfying.