Les plus Readers frequently describe the book as an engaging and thought-provoking exploration of contemporary culture. Its smooth, well-written style and anecdotal approach are often highlighted, offering worthwhile insights into the evolving landscape where high and low culture converge. The book provides fascinating glimpses behind the scenes of institutions like The New Yorker and MTV, alongside discussions of influential figures such as David Geffen and George Lucas. For those interested in the historical and personal journey through the commercialization of taste and the emergence of "nobrow" culture, many found it an entertaining and informative read, with some noting its surprising relevance even years after publication. It prompts readers to reflect on modern culture and the intricate relationship between culture and marketing.
Les moins However, a significant number of reviewers expressed disappointment, citing the book's perceived self-indulgence and lack of analytical depth. Critics frequently note that the author's focus often veers towards his personal background, family, and privilege, rather than consistently delivering the promised cultural analysis. Many found the cultural observations to be rudimentary, naive, or superficial, lacking rigorous sociological insight, historical perspective, or empirical support. The book is also criticized for being rambling, unfocused, and at times feeling like a collection of disparate articles rather than a cohesive argument, with some finding it choppy. Readers seeking a serious, objective study of cultural shifts were often left unsatisfied, describing it as "thin gruel" or "boring" due to its perceived lack of substantial analytical content and a failure to fully explore its central concept. Some also felt the analysis dated quickly, particularly regarding digital culture, and neglected the role of consumers or the internet's broader influence.
Conclusion Ultimately, this book garners a mixed reception, standing as a somewhat divisive read. It is likely to appeal most to those who appreciate a personal, anecdotal narrative style and are interested in a less formal, more reflective take on the commercialization of taste and the blending of high and low culture into "nobrow." Readers who enjoy behind-the-scenes glimpses into media institutions and the lives of cultural figures, and who are open to a subjective exploration of these themes, may find it a thought-provoking conversation starter. However, those seeking a deeply researched, empirically supported, or highly structured academic text on cultural theory, or readers who are easily put off by an author's perceived self-focus and privileged perspective, may find it falls short of their expectations.
