Nuṣūṣ mutawaḥḥishah: al-takfīr min urthūdhuksīyat al-Salājiqah ilá salafīyat Ibn Taymīyah = Texts of monstrosity : takfir from the Seljuks' orthodoxism to Ibn Taymiyyah's salafism

The book has been widely praised for its insightful historical and critical analysis of takfir (excommunication) texts, positioning them primarily within a political rather than purely religious context. Many reviewers found it highly beneficial for understanding the deep historical roots of religious extremism and conflicts prevalent in the contemporary Arab world. The author, Dr. Ali Ahmed Al-Dairi, is commended for his analytical prowess, coherent narrative, and diligent historical research, which helps readers connect past events to current realities. The work is described as a valuable resource for anyone interested in tracing and comprehending the phenomenon of takfir, challenging traditional perceptions of influential historical figures and illustrating how religious edicts were often employed to legitimize political objectives.

Despite its strengths, the book faces several criticisms. Some reviewers found its methodology lacking, describing it as "journalistic sorcery" that repeats arguments without sufficient proof or a clear plan. A recurring critique points to a perceived lack of objectivity and balance, with accusations of bias, particularly in its focus on Sunni figures and alleged defense of certain historical groups, while neglecting similar issues within Shia thought. Other reviewers suggest an "Orientalist" or "culturalist" approach that overemphasizes historical heritage while not adequately addressing modern political, psychological, and economic factors contributing to extremism. Minor criticisms include excessive footnotes that can distract the reader, some repetitive explanations, and a perceived lack of detail or depth in certain theological discussions.

In summary, "Wild Texts" offers a provocative and largely appreciated exploration into the historical and political genesis of takfir. While lauded for its critical perspective and ability to shed light on the enduring influence of historical religious-political dynamics, it has also drawn criticism for its methodology, perceived biases, and selective focus. This book would particularly appeal to readers interested in a critical, historically-grounded analysis of religious extremism and its political underpinnings, especially those open to re-examining the roles of prominent historical figures. However, readers seeking an exhaustive, multi-faceted, and entirely objective account of takfir across all Islamic traditions might find its scope and arguments contentious or incomplete.