Návrat žítkovských bohyní

The reviews highlight a key strength of the book in its visual presentation. Readers particularly appreciated the illustrations and photographic material included, suggesting that these elements are well-executed and contribute positively to the overall experience. The book also features a name index, which can be a useful tool for readers navigating its content.

However, the reviews are predominantly critical of the book's textual content and structure. A significant point of contention is the author's writing style, which is frequently described as overly "esoteric" and prone to personal digressions, speculative theories, and even perceived conspiracy thinking. Reviewers found the book's organization illogical and confusing, with the author often jumping between disparate topics, resulting in a muddled and difficult-to-follow narrative. Furthermore, the book is criticized for a lack of factual accuracy, containing historical errors, contradictory statements, and implausible scenarios. Specific examples include incorrect dates and conflicting accounts of events or traditions. The author's inconsistent approach, wavering between ethnographic, historical, and esoteric perspectives, also drew criticism, as did the inclusion of seemingly irrelevant personal anecdotes and self-promotional content. Minor issues such as an inconsistent index, grammatical errors, and poor physical binding were also noted.

In conclusion, this book appears to offer a visually engaging experience, but its textual content is marred by significant issues regarding structure, factual accuracy, and the author's subjective approach. It is unlikely to appeal to readers seeking a rigorously researched, logically presented, or academically sound exploration of its subject. Instead, the book might best suit an audience primarily interested in its visual elements and open to a more personal, speculative, or "esoteric" interpretation of the topic, rather than a strictly historical or analytical one. Readers who are not deterred by factual inconsistencies or an unconventional, free-associative narrative style may find some aspects of the book intriguing.