Odcházení

Readers generally praise the book for its historical significance as the author's first play after his presidency, offering an intriguing look at political transitions and the dynamics of power. Many found the play's sarcastic and self-directed humor particularly engaging, with some reviewers noting its autobiographical or personally inspired nature. A frequently highlighted positive is the innovative incorporation of an "author's voice" or "voice from a megaphone," which was appreciated by many as an expertly integrated and complementary element that breaks the fourth wall. The work is seen as a contemporary political comedy that provides a cynical perspective on the self-serving nature and rhetoric of politicians. For some, it stands out as an amazing and very good play, with specific characters also receiving commendation.

However, a notable criticism is that the play does not consistently measure up to the author's earlier, more acclaimed works, with some elements perceived as recycled or derivative, particularly from previous plays. The author's voice, while innovative to some, was considered by others to be obtrusive, disruptive, or an unconvincing addition. Reviewers also felt that the play occasionally seemed "stilted" and that the author struggled to effectively merge his characteristic satirical style, honed during a different political era, with the realities of a democratic society, especially given the long gap in its creation. Certain parts of the play were described as superficial, with one character in particular noted as disjointed and one-dimensional, and there was a sense that the author's original tragic intent for the play was not fully realized, as stage productions often leaned into comedy.

Overall, the play elicits a range of mixed feelings, often celebrated for its unique concept and political insights but also critiqued for perceived shortcomings when compared to the author's established body of work. It is a piece that clearly sparks discussion among readers and critics, with some considering it a strong and compelling addition to his oeuvre, while others find it less impactful. This book would particularly appeal to readers interested in political satire, especially those familiar with the author's background and his distinctive perspective on power and societal structures. It is also recommended for those who enjoy plays featuring meta-commentary, direct address to the audience, and a cynical, self-aware humor that reflects on political life.