Positives This book is widely recognized for its unique and thought-provoking exploration of the psychology of killing, offering valuable insights into human nature and the profound impact of combat on individuals. Many readers found it to be an eye-opener, providing a deeper understanding of the soldier's experience, the aversion most humans have to taking a life, and the complex psychological conditioning militaries employ. Reviewers frequently praised the book for its accessibility, making a challenging subject understandable for a general audience, and its ability to stimulate critical thinking. It is also noted as a valuable resource for writers seeking to portray realistic emotional and psychological aftermaths of violent encounters.
Negatives However, the book also faces significant criticism for several notable flaws. A recurring complaint is the repetitive nature of its arguments and data, which some found tiresome. Many reviewers questioned the academic rigor and reliability of the research, particularly its heavy reliance on a disputed study and the inclusion of historical inaccuracies. The author is also frequently accused of presenting a biased, agenda-driven perspective, incorporating personal rants and moralizing on various social issues, such as the role of violent media, which many felt were unsupported by evidence and detracted from the core subject. Some critics also highlighted the book's oversimplification of complex psychological and historical phenomena, and a perceived lack of objectivity in its discussion of military actions.
Conclusion Despite its divisive aspects, "On Killing" is generally recommended for readers interested in the psychology of violence, military history, and the human mind, provided they approach it with a critical and open mind. While its arguments may not always be universally accepted or scientifically validated, the book’s originality and its unique focus on a difficult topic make it a compelling read. Those willing to look past its noted shortcomings and engage with its central thesis on the human reluctance to kill and the societal implications of combat will likely find it an informative and impactful experience.
