Pokok-pokok filsafat hukum apa dan bagaimana filsafat hukum Indonesia

The book is appreciated for its ambitious attempt to delve into Pancasila as a foundational source for Indonesian legal philosophy, a central theme that several reviewers found compelling. It is lauded for opening up a valuable space for discussion and critical examination regarding the legitimacy and role of Pancasila in this context. Some readers found the book to be generally positive, describing it as "good" or even "amazing," suggesting that it holds appeal for those interested in its core subject matter.

However, the reviews frequently highlight significant shortcomings, particularly regarding the book's depth and comprehensiveness. Critics note that the material, especially on general legal philosophy and the history of Eastern and Western philosophy, is presented as a mere overview, often too brief and fragmented, which can hinder a clear understanding. The discussion of Pancasila, despite being the book's main draw, is described as shallow. Furthermore, one reviewer expressed concern that the book might implicitly endorse specific interpretations of Pancasila that are perceived as historically controversial or contradictory to its core principles.

In conclusion, while the book may serve as a preliminary introduction to the concept of Pancasila as a source of Indonesian legal philosophy and sparks important discussions, it falls short for readers seeking a thorough or comprehensive exploration. It is best suited for those looking for a concise, initial glimpse into the subject, or who appreciate the book's core premise despite its lack of depth. Readers desiring an in-depth, critically nuanced, and comprehensive treatment of legal philosophy or a more robust analysis of Pancasila may find it beneficial to explore other resources.