Primeres Novel·les, Vol. 1

Readers appreciate certain positive aspects of these early works. The first novel is noted for its interesting dual narrative perspective, while the second is mentioned for its compelling core story and its ability to evoke connections to other significant literary pieces. Despite some challenges, specific passages, such as one describing a first communion and the concluding pages of the second novel, are highlighted as genuinely engaging. A consistent positive across both reviews is the inclusion of Roser Porta's editorial notes, which are praised for adding substantial value and context to the collection.

However, the reviews frequently point to a challenging reading experience. The language in these early novels is consistently described as heavy and cumbersome, making them less accessible for some readers. Critics found the character of the lover in the first novel to be a misogynistic caricature, and the protagonist's internal conflict regarding her honor was perceived as repetitive. Furthermore, the love stories and the remorse they generate were deemed boring by some. The execution and narrative style of the second novel, despite its promising premise, are also cited as hindering its potential impact.

Overall, while these early works present stylistic and narrative challenges, they are highly recommended for specific types of readers. The collection is considered invaluable for those interested in tracing the author's developmental journey and understanding the evolution of her craft. Dedicated readers of the author will find particular benefit, as the book, especially with the insightful accompanying notes, provides crucial context and deeper insights into her wider body of work. Therefore, it is best suited for literary scholars, devoted fans, and those keen on exploring the formative stages of a significant writer.