¿Qué es justicia?

The book is widely praised as an accessible and engaging introduction to the complex concept of justice, particularly for those looking to delve into Hans Kelsen's work or legal philosophy in general. Many reviewers found it to be a compact yet comprehensive overview, systematically exploring various definitions and concepts of justice from ancient to modern philosophers. Readers appreciated its ability to stimulate thought, broaden perspectives on a perennially debated subject, and question their own moral frameworks. Despite the challenging nature of the topic, the book was frequently described as entertaining, not boring, and written in a very understandable language that makes it a pleasant read. Its critical approach, challenging various philosophical viewpoints, was also highlighted as a positive aspect by some.

A recurring point of contention among reviewers is the book's explicit refusal to provide a definitive answer to the question "What is justice?" This lack of a clear conclusion left some readers feeling unsatisfied or even defrauded, particularly those seeking concrete solutions. Critics also pointed out what they perceived as inconsistencies or oversimplifications in Kelsen's positivist arguments, with some describing his critiques of other philosophical ideas as flawed or based on "straw man" arguments. While generally accessible, some reviewers noted that a foundational understanding of general philosophy and philosophy of law is beneficial for grasping certain nuances. Additionally, some found the book to be either too short, leaving them wanting more depth, or conversely, somewhat redundant in its argumentation, despite its concise length. A few strong negative opinions deemed the essay "mediocre" or "catastrophic" for its perceived lack of foundational moral theory.

Despite these polarized opinions, the book generally emerges as a valuable and thought-provoking read that excels at initiating discussion rather than settling it. It is particularly recommended for students of law or philosophy, individuals interested in Kelsen's specific contributions to legal positivism, or anyone eager to engage with fundamental questions of morality and societal order without expecting a simple resolution. The book serves as an excellent starting point for exploring the multifaceted nature of justice, encouraging readers to reflect critically and potentially seek out further readings from a diverse range of philosophical perspectives. Ultimately, it appeals to those who appreciate a rigorous, albeit sometimes controversial, analysis that prompts deeper personal and intellectual inquiry into one of humanity's enduring dilemmas.