Add to library
You don't have any lists yet. Create one in My Library.
Go to My LibraryAdd to library
You don't have any lists yet. Create one in My Library.
Go to My LibraryRapport de la Troisième Consultation Intergouvernementale Sur la Création D'une Commission Des Pêches Pour Le Sud-ouest de L'Océan Indien
by
- Language
- French
- Published in
- Publisher
- Food & Agriculture Org.
- Pages
- 51
- ISBN
- 9789250051604
Subjects
The delegates from fifteen nations and various international organizations converged in Nairobi, a gathering convened to shape the future of fisheries within the Southwest Indian Ocean. The air was thick with the weight of responsibility, as the previous attempts to forge a unified regional body had highlighted deep divisions, particularly concerning the vast, untamed expanse of the high seas. This assembly, the third of its kind, was tasked with navigating these complex currents, seeking a path toward sustainable management of the region's vital marine resources.
A pivotal understanding emerged from the discussions: the intricate tapestry of fishing activities in the Southwest Indian Ocean demanded a bifurcated approach. It became clear that a single, overarching instrument could not adequately address the distinct challenges of coastal waters, intimately tied to the livelihoods of local communities, and the broader, more complex governance required for the distant, often contested, high seas. This consensus marked a significant turning point in the ongoing efforts to establish a robust framework for fisheries management.
For the fisheries nestled within the exclusive economic zones and territorial waters of coastal states, the consultation resolved to establish a regional body under Article VI of the FAO Constitution. This entity, envisioned to possess advisory powers, would serve as a beacon for cooperation, guiding the management and development of coastal fisheries. Its mandate would center on fostering sustainable practices and supporting the nations whose shores met these rich fishing grounds.
However, the high seas presented a different set of challenges, demanding a more formidable response. The delegates agreed that a separate, independent instrument, operating outside the direct purview of the FAO, was essential. This distinct body would be endowed with the authority to enact legally binding decisions on conservation and management measures, a crucial power to curb the pervasive threats of illegal, unregulated, and unreported fishing that plagued these international waters.
A key principle underscored during these deliberations was the undeniable right of coastal states to actively participate in the governance of these high seas fisheries. The consultation meticulously explored the intricate linkages between the proposed coastal state arrangements and the forthcoming high seas instrument, recognizing that the health of one profoundly influenced the other. The aim was to create a cohesive, interconnected system that respected national sovereignty while addressing the shared responsibility for migratory and straddling fish stocks.
By the close of the consultation, significant progress had been achieved in drafting the foundational documents for this dual approach. A draft resolution destined for the FAO Council, alongside the statutes for the advisory regional body for coastal fisheries, stood largely agreed upon. Furthermore, the assembly delved into the nascent elements of a potential agreement for the high seas, laying the groundwork for its eventual formulation.
The urgency of these efforts was palpable, driven by the stark realities facing the region's marine ecosystems. Outdated national legislation, a severe lack of capacity for surveillance and enforcement, and insufficient scientific research had left many fish stocks vulnerable to overexploitation. The specter of illegal, unregulated, and unreported fishing loomed large, threatening both the ecological balance and the economic stability of coastal communities. This consultation served as a powerful testament to the collective determination to forge a future where the bounty of the Southwest Indian Ocean could be sustainably managed for generations to come.
A pivotal understanding emerged from the discussions: the intricate tapestry of fishing activities in the Southwest Indian Ocean demanded a bifurcated approach. It became clear that a single, overarching instrument could not adequately address the distinct challenges of coastal waters, intimately tied to the livelihoods of local communities, and the broader, more complex governance required for the distant, often contested, high seas. This consensus marked a significant turning point in the ongoing efforts to establish a robust framework for fisheries management.
For the fisheries nestled within the exclusive economic zones and territorial waters of coastal states, the consultation resolved to establish a regional body under Article VI of the FAO Constitution. This entity, envisioned to possess advisory powers, would serve as a beacon for cooperation, guiding the management and development of coastal fisheries. Its mandate would center on fostering sustainable practices and supporting the nations whose shores met these rich fishing grounds.
However, the high seas presented a different set of challenges, demanding a more formidable response. The delegates agreed that a separate, independent instrument, operating outside the direct purview of the FAO, was essential. This distinct body would be endowed with the authority to enact legally binding decisions on conservation and management measures, a crucial power to curb the pervasive threats of illegal, unregulated, and unreported fishing that plagued these international waters.
A key principle underscored during these deliberations was the undeniable right of coastal states to actively participate in the governance of these high seas fisheries. The consultation meticulously explored the intricate linkages between the proposed coastal state arrangements and the forthcoming high seas instrument, recognizing that the health of one profoundly influenced the other. The aim was to create a cohesive, interconnected system that respected national sovereignty while addressing the shared responsibility for migratory and straddling fish stocks.
By the close of the consultation, significant progress had been achieved in drafting the foundational documents for this dual approach. A draft resolution destined for the FAO Council, alongside the statutes for the advisory regional body for coastal fisheries, stood largely agreed upon. Furthermore, the assembly delved into the nascent elements of a potential agreement for the high seas, laying the groundwork for its eventual formulation.
The urgency of these efforts was palpable, driven by the stark realities facing the region's marine ecosystems. Outdated national legislation, a severe lack of capacity for surveillance and enforcement, and insufficient scientific research had left many fish stocks vulnerable to overexploitation. The specter of illegal, unregulated, and unreported fishing loomed large, threatening both the ecological balance and the economic stability of coastal communities. This consultation served as a powerful testament to the collective determination to forge a future where the bounty of the Southwest Indian Ocean could be sustainably managed for generations to come.
No discussions yet for this book.
Delete Discussion
Are you sure you want to delete this discussion? This action cannot be undone.
No reviews yet. Be the first to review this book!
Delete Review
Are you sure you want to delete this review? This action cannot be undone.







