Tārīkh-i Ijtimāʻī-i Zanān Dar ʻaṣr-i Qājār

The book is praised for its appealing article titles and the diverse topics it covers regarding the social status of women in the Qajar era. Many readers found it to be a fluent and easy-to-read collection, providing a good general overview for those new to the subject. Specific articles, such as those exploring the "Shabestan" institution or analyzing the personal memoirs of women from that period, were highlighted as particularly engaging and informative. The inclusion of narratives from foreign travelers also added an interesting dimension to the content. For some, the book was inspiring, shedding light on women who had aspirations beyond their time and contributed to the advancement of fundamental rights.

However, several reviewers noted that the book might not offer substantial new information for readers already well-versed in the Qajar period, with some finding its content to be somewhat superficial. The introduction was described as dry and lacking enjoyment. A significant criticism revolved around a perceived one-sidedness or bias evident in certain articles, where authors' personal opinions seemed to influence the historical narrative. Examples cited include potentially unbalanced historical comparisons and strong critiques of specific historical figures or movements without presenting a more balanced perspective. Additionally, the book was observed to focus predominantly on women of the Qajar court rather than ordinary women in society, and some felt it occasionally undermined previously encountered interesting historical discussions.

Overall, the book is considered an interesting compilation that serves as a valuable starting point for readers curious about the social history of women in the Qajar era, especially those with limited prior knowledge of the period. While it offers a broad overview and can be an engaging read for newcomers, those already familiar with the subject may find it to be more of a good summary of existing information rather than a source of fresh insights. Given the noted biases in some sections, it is recommended that readers approach this book as one of several resources, ideally comparing its content with other historical accounts to achieve a more comprehensive and balanced understanding of the era.