Positives The reviews offer limited explicit positive feedback regarding the book's content or execution. One brief comment directly acknowledges the author, Dr. Furedi, which may imply an appreciation for their contribution to the ongoing discussion on the subject.
Negatives However, the primary feedback expresses significant disappointment. Critics found the arguments inconsistent and insufficiently developed, noting that key premises often lacked proper justification. The book was also criticized for frequently misrepresenting opposing viewpoints, engaging in caricatures rather than directly addressing nuanced arguments, which consequently undermined its persuasiveness. Furthermore, despite being titled a "moral case," the central thrust of the book's argument was perceived as primarily pragmatic rather than ethical, creating a disconnect between the title and its actual content.
Conclusion The overall sentiment suggests that the book does not successfully deliver on its promise to provide a strong ethical argument. While it might appeal to readers already aligned with a pragmatic perspective on the topic, or those seeking an introduction to some arguments, readers looking for a rigorously reasoned, consistent, and balanced moral defense of the subject are likely to be disappointed.
