The Story Of Arch In Ciel

The book is widely praised for being a very informative and captivating compilation about the band, L'Arc-en-Ciel. Readers appreciate it as a fan-created effort that conveniently gathers details on the band's career journey, facts about individual members, and comprehensive tracklists of their albums and singles. Many reviewers, including some long-time fans, discovered new and interesting facts, such as insights into past members, details about a member's academic background, or anecdotes from a lead singer's childhood. For many, it serves as a comforting and beloved item, providing an accessible source of information for those eager to learn more about the band without extensive research.

Despite its informational value, the book receives consistent criticism for significant editorial shortcomings. Multiple reviewers point out the abundance of typos and unnecessary words, leading to questions about the quality of editing and proofreading. Some established fans found the content to be rather ordinary, suggesting that it might not offer substantial new revelations for those already well-versed in the band's history. One reviewer even felt that older magazine compilations provided a more complete and engaging presentation. Additionally, there was some skepticism regarding the depth or absolute veracity of the personal facts shared, hinting that it might not truly delve into the "secret lives" of the members.

In conclusion, this book presents a balanced experience, serving primarily as a heartfelt tribute and a convenient resource for fans. While it is celebrated for its informative nature and the effort put into compiling band-related content, its enjoyment can be hampered by noticeable editorial flaws. Therefore, this book would appeal most to newer fans of L'Arc-en-Ciel or those who desire a single, accessible source for general information about the band and its members. It is also a suitable read for Cielers who value any fan-produced material and are willing to overlook production imperfections for the sake of their beloved band, though highly critical readers or those seeking a deeply analytical or flawlessly edited work might find it less satisfying.