Will Durant's The Story of Philosophy is widely praised for its engaging and accessible approach, making the ideas of historically significant philosophers come alive for the general reader. Reviewers frequently highlight Durant's skill in blending biographical details with philosophical concepts, presenting thinkers and their ideas as organic products of their character and historical context. This method is often cited as making the book a joy to read and sparking a genuine interest in philosophy, even for novices. Many appreciate the clarity and insight of Durant's explanations, particularly when he incorporates the philosophers' own words, which helps to illuminate complex thoughts without excessive commentary. The book is lauded for its ability to synthesize historical, biographical, and philosophical elements into a coherent and stimulating narrative, prompting readers to delve deeper into the original works.
Disliked
Despite its strengths, the book draws considerable criticism for its selective and sometimes biased presentation. A recurring concern is its almost exclusive focus on Western philosophy, leading many to suggest it should be titled "The Story of European Philosophy" due to the omission of Eastern and Islamic traditions. Reviewers also question Durant's criteria for selecting philosophers, noting the absence of key figures like Descartes, Hume, and Marx, while dedicating extensive chapters to others deemed less central or even outdated. Critics point to Durant's stated disdain for epistemology, arguing that its exclusion fundamentally misrepresents modern philosophical development. Furthermore, some find his tendency to psychoanalyze philosophers' ideas as mere byproducts of their personal lives to be an oversimplification, failing to adequately convey the logical argumentation central to philosophical thought. Instances of authorial bias, such as perceived favoritism towards certain philosophers or a "narrow-minded contempt" for mathematics and logic, are also noted.
In short
Ultimately, The Story of Philosophy remains a highly recommended entry point for those new to the subject, despite its limitations. It serves as an excellent introduction for the layman, providing a clear and coherent overview that kindles curiosity and encourages further exploration. While not a comprehensive academic history, its approachable style and ability to humanize complex ideas make it a valuable "gateway" book for anyone interested in understanding the broad sweep of Western thought. Readers should approach it as a stimulating, albeit selective, overview rather than a definitive or exhaustive account, recognizing that it offers a foundational framework from which to embark on a more in-depth study of philosophy.