Positives Robert Macfarlane's Underland is widely celebrated for its exceptionally beautiful and evocative writing, with many reviewers praising his poetic command of language and ability to create vivid descriptions that immerse the reader. The book is lauded for its expansive scope, delving into a diverse array of subterranean topics from natural caves and glaciers to ancient burial sites, mining tunnels, and urban catacombs beneath cities like Paris. Readers appreciate how Macfarlane seamlessly blends elements of travelogue, adventure, natural history, geology, and philosophy, offering a multi-layered exploration of the world beneath our feet. Many found the book's discussions on "deep time," the hidden life of forests (the "wood wide web"), and humanity's legacy for the future to be profoundly thought-provoking and inspiring. The author's passion for his subject and humble approach resonate with readers, making complex themes both accessible and exhilarating, and often leading to a refreshing change in perspective on the environment and our place within it.
Negatives Despite widespread acclaim, some reviewers found Macfarlane's distinctive style to be a significant barrier. Critics described the writing as overly flowery, repetitive, and at times indulgent, leading to an "exhausting" reading experience that felt "crushing" under the weight of its prose. For those seeking a purely scientific or fact-driven non-fiction, the book's blend of personal reflection, mythology, and poetic language was a mismatch, with some finding observations poorly evidenced or descriptions pedestrian. The book's non-linear structure and the author's tendency to jump between wildly different topics were also points of contention, making it feel like a "hodgepodge" that didn't always cohere. A few reviewers also noted the book's Eurocentric focus, with a perceived omission of underground explorations or perspectives from outside Europe. Additionally, some felt a sense of exclusion, suggesting the book's tone and subject matter catered to a specific, well-traveled demographic.
Conclusion Overall, Underland emerges as a critically acclaimed and highly recommended work, though its unique style means it may not appeal to all readers. While a minority found it unengaging or difficult to finish, the vast majority found it to be a masterful and enriching literary journey. This book is particularly well-suited for readers who appreciate lyrical, contemplative nature writing and are open to a blend of adventure, science, history, and philosophical inquiry. It will strongly appeal to those interested in environmental themes, the concept of "deep time," and humanity's relationship with the unseen world below the surface. However, it is not recommended for those who suffer from claustrophobia, prefer strictly factual non-fiction, or desire a linear, straightforward narrative. Those who enjoy a book that encourages deep reflection and offers a new perspective on the planet are likely to find Underland a compelling and memorable read, perhaps best savored slowly like poetry.
