Positives The book is widely praised for its refreshing and optimistic vision for the future, moving beyond current systemic issues to propose a better alternative. Readers found its ideas compelling, offering a hopeful antidote to prevailing neoliberal nihilism and the sense that "there is no alternative." Many appreciate the author's daring to think big and present a practical call to action, outlining how technological advancements could lead to a post-scarcity, post-work, and more equitable world. The book is noted for its clear, accessible language, enthusiastic storytelling, and the extensive data and concrete examples provided to support its arguments. It is seen as an important work for demonstrating imagination on the left, envisioning a different society, and offering tangible recommendations for progress.
Negatives However, several reviewers express significant reservations, particularly regarding the practicality and underlying assumptions of the proposed future. Criticisms include the author's perceived naivety about the political and economic hurdles to implementing such changes, with doubts that gradual reforms would suffice. Some found policy proposals to be either overly specific or too vague, and questioned the realism of certain technological solutions, such as the reliance on asteroid mining for resources or the capacity of solar energy alone to meet global demands without considering nuclear power. Concerns were also raised about the limited discussion of imperialism, global wealth distribution, and the historical issues of racism and ableism within medicine, especially in relation to advanced genetic technologies. A perceived lack of citations and an inconsistent writing style were also noted by some.
Conclusion Overall, the book is recommended as an essential and thought-provoking read, particularly for those interested in exploring radical possibilities for future societies and challenging the status quo. While some find its optimism infectious and its arguments inspiring, others caution that it can be overly idealistic or lacks the depth required for a thorough political and economic analysis. It is best suited for open-minded individuals who are willing to engage with ambitious ideas about how technology could reshape society, serving as a catalyst for discussion and a reminder of humanity's potential for collective imagination, even if its proposed solutions are viewed as a starting point for debate rather than a definitive roadmap.
