Το παράπονο της Βρισηίδας έρωτας, επιθυμία και εγκράτεια στην ελληνική και ρωμαϊκή αρχαιότητα

The book is praised for offering a collection of popularized articles that present a fresh, "heretical" perspective on historical subjects. Readers appreciate its ability to challenge common perceptions and explain historical nuances to a non-specialist audience. It is noted for containing a significant amount of information and maintaining a style consistent with the author's previous works, which fans may find familiar and engaging.

However, several criticisms are raised regarding the book's execution. Reviewers found that the content sometimes deviates from its central thematic axis, leading to an inconsistent focus. Some sections are described as overly academic, potentially alienating a general readership, while the writing style is occasionally criticized for being either verbose or too concise, lacking the usual precision associated with the author. Furthermore, the connection between the content and the book's title is sometimes perceived as tenuous or "far-fetched," and the book doesn't always fully commit to the main perspective it introduces.

In conclusion, while the book offers valuable information and an intriguing alternative viewpoint on history, its inconsistent structure and varying tone may hinder the reading experience for some. It may appeal most to readers who are already familiar with and enjoy the author's distinctive style and "heretical" approach to historical topics, and who are willing to overlook occasional deviations from the central theme in favor of new insights. Those seeking a tightly focused and consistently accessible popular history might find it less satisfying than the author's other works.