Левски & попа българите нямат нужда от Господ -- те си имат Левски : анкета по случай 170 години от рождението на Апостола

The book is noted for its interesting sociological and ethnopsychological research. This particular study involves a unique approach, utilizing two distinct questions concerning the historical figures of Levski and Father Krastyo, which readers may find insightful and thought-provoking.

However, critics point out that the author, identified as a journalist, tends to impose his viewpoint in a tendentious and somewhat aggressive manner. Specifically, the book strongly asserts Father Krastyo's responsibility as Levski's betrayer, despite acknowledging that there is no unambiguous historical evidence to conclusively prove or disprove this accusation. This forceful presentation of a debated historical opinion, without definitive proof, is highlighted as a significant drawback.

In conclusion, the book offers a polarizing perspective on a long-standing historical debate. While it provides an interesting research methodology from a sociological and ethnopsychological standpoint, its strong, opinionated stance on Father Krastyo's role, presented without conclusive evidence, may divide readers. This book would likely appeal to those interested in historical controversies, particularly surrounding the figures of Levski and Father Krastyo, who are open to a journalistic, opinion-driven approach and appreciate unique research methods, even if the conclusions are strongly asserted. It is suitable for readers who enjoy engaging with challenging historical interpretations and different perspectives, rather than those seeking a strictly objective historical account.