العثمنة الجديدة: القطيعة في التاريخ الموازي بين العرب والأتراك

The reviews acknowledge some positive aspects of the book, primarily noting that it demonstrates a good research effort. The author is also recognized as a well-known and famous academic, suggesting a certain level of prominence or expertise in their field.

However, the book faces substantial criticism for its perceived biases and structural shortcomings. Reviewers describe it as a miserable nationalist reading, deeply influenced by a secular modernist perspective that leads to a fundamental misunderstanding of its subject. The analysis is seen as obsessed and heavily colored by the historical tensions between Arab and Turkish nationalisms, as well as between secular and Islamic orientations. Structurally, the book is criticized for being disjointed, chaotic, and appearing to be pieced together from various sources, indicating a lack of care from both the author and the publishing center. A clear nationalist bias and prejudice against the Islamic ideology of a specific political party are also highlighted. Additionally, the book's exorbitant price is mentioned as a negative factor.

In summary, the book is largely viewed as problematic due to its strong biases and structural issues, despite the underlying research effort. It might appeal to readers specifically interested in a nationalist, secular-modernist viewpoint on its topic, or those willing to overlook significant analytical and organizational flaws for the sake of the raw research. However, it is generally not recommended for readers seeking an objective, comprehensive, or well-structured analysis, particularly concerning subjects related to Islamic identity or contemporary Turkish politics.