‏تکوين نهاد مرجعيت تقليد شيعه :‏ ‏گفتارى در تحولات سياسى و اجتماعى روحانيت شيعه در دوره قاجار و پهلوى اول

The book is recognized as a notable academic work from its faculty, standing out as one of the limited studies available in the specialized field of clergy and jurisprudence. Reviewers highlight its engagement with crucial subjects, particularly the historical development of concepts such as the Khums fatwa and the theory of emulation. Despite certain criticisms, the core chapters are acknowledged for containing valuable data and presenting important insights into the history of religious authority.

However, the reviews frequently point to significant structural and methodological weaknesses. A primary concern is the disorganized nature of the text and a confusing presentation of historical information. Critics argue that theoretical frameworks, specifically Weber's organizational theories, are forcibly applied to the historical data, rather than being organically derived from it. This is attributed to methodological ambiguity, further compounded by an apparent attempt to employ Foucault's analytical approach without proper integration or referencing. Consequently, the body of the text is perceived to contradict its own conclusions, leading to a disconnect between the presented historical points and the final verdict. Ultimately, some reviewers suggest the work falls short of the expected standards for a doctoral thesis.

In conclusion, the book offers valuable historical data and explores significant, under-researched topics within the history of religious authority. While it presents important information and insights, its overall impact is diminished by issues related to organization, theoretical application, and methodological rigor. This book would likely appeal to readers with a strong interest in the specific historical details and the evolution of religious concepts, particularly those willing to overlook structural inconsistencies and engage critically with its theoretical framework. It may be less suitable for those seeking a perfectly structured or methodologically unassailable academic study.