‏در دامگه حادثه dar damgah hadeseh

This book is widely praised for offering a unique and valuable perspective on contemporary Iranian history, particularly the events leading up to the 1979 revolution. Reviewers highlight its importance as a firsthand account from Parviz Sabeti, a high-ranking official within SAVAK, providing insights into a period often viewed through limited or ideologically biased lenses. Many appreciate the extensive information about behind-the-scenes occurrences, the causes of the Shah's downfall, SAVAK's operations, and the roles of key figures and foreign powers. The detailed footnotes provided by the interviewer are frequently noted for adding valuable context and supplementary information, enhancing the reader's understanding. Despite its considerable length, the conversational style is often cited as making the book engaging and accessible, serving as a crucial document for those seeking to broaden their historical understanding.

However, the book also draws significant criticism regarding its objectivity and historical veracity. Many reviewers express skepticism about the accuracy and completeness of Sabeti's narratives, noting that much of the information lacks independent corroboration and, in some instances, appears to contradict established facts. A major point of contention centers on the interviewer, Erfan Ghanei-Fard, who is frequently accused of being overly deferential, uncritical, and biased in favor of the Pahlavi regime, thus failing to challenge Sabeti adequately. Critics also point out Sabeti's own biases, his tendency to defend his actions without acknowledging mistakes, and his selective revelation of information, often praising allies while exposing the perceived flaws of rivals. Some reviews also mention the use of misogynistic language. Consequently, many conclude that the book, while interesting, should not be considered a definitive or entirely trustworthy historical source.

In conclusion, this book stands as a significant, albeit controversial, contribution to the historiography of modern Iran. While it may not serve as a sole, definitive historical account, it offers an indispensable, previously unheard viewpoint from a key figure within the Pahlavi system. Readers are encouraged to approach the content with a critical mindset, cross-referencing its narratives with other historical sources. It is particularly recommended for history enthusiasts, scholars, and anyone deeply interested in the Iranian Revolution and the Pahlavi era, especially those seeking to understand complex events from diverse perspectives and challenge established narratives. Despite its noted flaws, many reviewers believe the unique insights provided by Sabeti make it a worthwhile read for a more comprehensive understanding of a pivotal and complex period.