من منهاتن إلى بغداد - ما وراء الخير والشر

Reviewers praised the book for its ambitious and insightful approach to understanding complex historical events. It is highlighted as a beautiful book that attempts a deep, philosophical analysis of significant global incidents. The work is structured as a dialogue between Mohammed Arkoun and Joseph Maïla, aiming to explore "the unthought" and "that which cannot be thought" regarding a major historical event. Readers appreciated its multi-faceted methodology, which proposes examining events from both objective and phenomenological perspectives, and by tracing their origins in the past while also considering their implications for the future.

However, not all readers found the execution to consistently match the ambitious framework. One reviewer expressed disappointment, stating that the book did not meet the high standards of Arkoun's previous works. There was also a critique suggesting that despite its proposed rigorous methodology, the discussions sometimes veered into abstract confrontations or focused on emotional impacts rather than maintaining a purely analytical stance. This indicates that some readers felt the book occasionally fell short of its own intellectual aspirations.

Overall, the book offers a thought-provoking intellectual dialogue attempting to dissect the profound effects of a pivotal global event on both Western and Islamic societies. While some found its depth and analytical rigor commendable, others felt it did not consistently achieve the expected level of intellectual engagement. This book would appeal to readers interested in deep philosophical and historical analysis, intellectual dialogues, and those who appreciate a multi-layered approach to understanding contemporary global challenges, particularly those who are already familiar with or interested in the works of Mohammed Arkoun and Joseph Maïla.