Come cavalli che dormono in piedi

The book is widely praised for its exceptional prose and the author's evocative, intense writing style, which many describe as a "masterpiece of historical narrative." Reviewers highlight the author's ability to uncover and passionately recount a largely forgotten chapter of history: the experiences of Italian-speaking soldiers from regions like Trieste and Trentino who fought for the Austro-Hungarian Empire during World War I. This unique perspective is seen as a crucial contribution to understanding the complexities of the past, often obscured by nationalistic narratives. Readers appreciate the book's profound emotional impact, its ability to evoke a sense of shared tragedy, and its powerful reflections on memory, identity, and the origins of modern European conflicts. The author's blend of travelogue, personal journey, and historical inquiry is found to be deeply engaging, offering fresh insights into the historical roots of contemporary geopolitical issues, particularly in Eastern Europe.

Despite its strengths, several reviewers found the book challenging. A recurring criticism is the lack of a clear narrative structure or a cohesive "filo conduttore," with some describing it as a collection of impressions and testimonies rather than a tightly woven historical or journalistic account. This often led to a sense of prolixity, with the lyrical style becoming heavy or repetitive over too many pages, making it difficult to maintain concentration. Some felt the author's personal reflections and digressions overshadowed the historical facts, leading to a perceived lack of objectivity. Critics also noted an excessive use of rhetoric, which ironically, the book itself criticizes in official historical accounts, and a tendency towards personal evaluations rather than factual reporting. Furthermore, some wished for a deeper exploration of the specific geographical and historical details of the Eastern Front, feeling that the focus often shifted too much to the author's personal connections or broader philosophical points about modern Europe.

Ultimately, the book emerges as a powerful and thought-provoking work, albeit one that demands a patient and engaged reader. It is highly recommended for those interested in the untold stories of World War I, particularly the often-overlooked experiences of soldiers from the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Readers keen on exploring the intricate connections between historical events and current European identity, as well as those who appreciate a deeply personal and reflective approach to history, will likely find this book profoundly rewarding. It appeals to individuals who value the preservation of memory and are willing to grapple with a dense, non-linear narrative that prioritizes atmosphere, emotion, and philosophical inquiry over a conventional historical chronology. However, readers seeking a straightforward, fact-driven historical account or a light, easy read might find its style and structure less appealing.