Positives Peter Kuper's "Diario de Oaxaca" is widely praised for its exceptional artistic quality and unique presentation. Reviewers consistently highlight Kuper's stunning illustrations, sketches, and mixed-media collages, noting his keen "naturalist's eye" particularly for insects and plants, which fill many pages with vibrant detail. The book's bilingual format, featuring both English and Spanish text on nearly every page, is a significant draw, making it accessible to a wider audience and an excellent resource for language learners. Readers appreciate how Kuper captures the essence of Oaxaca, from its daily life, rich culture, and natural beauty to the specific sounds and smells of the region. Many describe it as an intimate and personal journal, offering a sympathetic outsider's observational perspective on the local events and political atmosphere during his two-year sabbatical. The physical book design itself is often commended for its heirloom quality, with full-color, full-bleed pages and thoughtful details.
Negatives While generally positive, some reviewers express reservations regarding the book's depth and narrative cohesion. A common point of criticism is the perceived lack of in-depth analysis, particularly concerning the complex political situation or the teacher's strike, with some wishing for more detailed journalistic insight rather than just observations. The text is occasionally described as repetitive or lacking a strong central theme, leading to a somewhat choppy reading experience for some. A few readers felt that, despite covering two years, the book's content was relatively sparse or that "hardly anything happens," wishing for more extensive material. Additionally, at least one reviewer found Kuper's tone regarding his experience in Oaxaca to be overly self-important, questioning his perspective as an "accidental observer" during a period of local unrest. It is also noted that the book is primarily a sketchbook and travelogue, rather than a traditional graphic novel with a continuous sequential narrative, which might not meet the expectations of all readers.
Conclusion Despite these critiques, the overall consensus for "Diario de Oaxaca" is overwhelmingly positive, with many considering it a beautiful and recommended work. It is particularly well-suited for readers who appreciate unique visual storytelling and Kuper's distinctive artistic style, which blends various mediums to create a dynamic experience. The book is an ideal choice for those interested in travel memoirs, Mexican culture, and specifically the vibrant atmosphere of Oaxaca, often inspiring a desire to visit the region. Its bilingual nature makes it perfect for language students or anyone looking to engage with both English and Spanish texts. Ultimately, "Diario de Oaxaca" appeals to readers seeking an intimate, observational journey through an artist's eyes, valuing impressions and personal reflections over a deep, analytical report. It is also frequently recommended as an excellent companion piece to Kuper's other work, "Ruins."
