Positives The reviews highlight several positive aspects of the book. It is praised for being well-written and for its accessibility, particularly as a popular history book written in English, which broadens its potential readership. Reviewers also appreciate the initial chapter, which thoroughly explains and analyzes both Romanian and Hungarian sources related to the historical figure at its core, indicating a diligent approach to research and an attempt to present a comprehensive view of the available information.
Negatives However, the book is not without its criticisms. A significant concern raised is the excessive use of Romanian words and place names, even when referring to locations that were not historically identified as Romanian during the period covered. This linguistic choice, coupled with what is described as a noticeable Romanian bias, detracts from the book's overall objectivity in the eyes of some readers.
Conclusion In conclusion, this book appears to be a well-written and valuable contribution to popular history, making complex topics accessible to an English-speaking audience. While it is commended for its initial thoroughness in source examination, potential readers should be aware of the linguistic choices and perceived nationalistic slant. It would likely appeal most to readers interested in historical popularizations who appreciate a clear narrative, but who are also prepared to critically engage with the presented perspectives and terminology.
