Moralia. In 16 vols. [Vol.] 4. 263d-351b. Transl. by Frank Cole Babbitt. (Repr.).

The book is praised for being an invaluable source of information, particularly regarding ancient Roman religious practices and a wide array of other topics including Greek customs, history, pronunciation, and even daily life details like exercise and war. Readers found the format of posing questions and offering various answers, especially in The Roman and Greek Questions, to be engaging. The essays concerning Alexander the Great are highlighted as fun, offering unique insights and an interesting perspective on his conquests, complementing information found elsewhere. The speech on the Fame of the Athenians also received positive mention. The work is generally appreciated for revealing interesting and sometimes odd customs of the Romans and Greeks.

However, the collection is noted for some significant drawbacks. One reviewer described it as a "lesser offering," suggesting it lacks the depth of moral discussion implied by its title. The section titled Greek and Roman Parallel Stories is particularly criticized, with one review explicitly calling them "dumb" and expressing relief that they are likely not Plutarch's original work. Additionally, while generally considered good, the book is sometimes repetitive, which might detract from the reading experience for some. The final three essays are also observed to read like abruptly ending orations.

In conclusion, this volume offers a fascinating exploration of ancient Roman and Greek customs, religious practices, and historical figures through a series of essays that delve into questions of virtue versus fortune. While some sections, particularly the Parallel Stories, are less engaging or even disappointing, the book shines as a repository of unique historical details and perspectives. It would appeal most to readers with a keen interest in classical antiquity, particularly those eager to learn about the specific customs and beliefs of the Romans and Greeks, or those seeking alternative insights into figures like Alexander the Great. It is best suited for those who appreciate Plutarch's distinctive questioning style and historical anecdotes, even when the moral discussions might not be as pronounced as expected.