Positives This book is frequently praised for offering a unique, firsthand account from a central figure during a critical period in Iraq's recent history. Many readers found it to be a valuable resource for understanding the intricate political landscape and the immense challenges faced during the first year of the US occupation. Reviewers often acknowledge the incredibly complex and difficult situation the author encountered, dealing with diverse Iraqi factions, bureaucratic struggles, and conflicting agendas from Washington. The book provides detailed insight into the day-to-day operations and decision-making processes of the Coalition Provisional Authority, making it an enlightening read for those seeking a deeper understanding of the origins of contemporary issues in Iraq.
Negatives However, the book draws significant criticism for its perceived bias and lack of self-reflection. Numerous reviewers describe it as self-serving, an attempt to whitewash contentious decisions, and a product of ignorance and hubris. A major point of contention is the author's defense of highly criticized actions, such as the disbanding of the Iraqi army, which many analysts view as a catastrophic mistake that fueled insurgency. Critics also note a lack of corroborating sources, making it difficult to verify the author's account of private meetings and internal deliberations. The book is often seen as omitting or downplaying crucial negative aspects, including civilian casualties and the broader Iraqi perspective, and some found its optimistic conclusion jarringly disconnected from the realities on the ground.
Conclusion In conclusion, this book serves as a significant primary source for anyone interested in the immediate aftermath of the 2003 Iraq invasion and the complexities of the Coalition Provisional Authority's tenure. While it offers valuable insights into the political and administrative challenges from the author's perspective, readers should approach it with a critical eye, recognizing its inherent bias and the absence of external verification. It is particularly recommended for historians, political science enthusiasts, and those seeking to understand the roots of current Iraqi affairs, provided it is read alongside other accounts to gain a more comprehensive and balanced view of the period.
