Positives Robert McKee's "Story" is widely praised as an exceptionally dense and insightful guide to the craft of storytelling. Reviewers consistently highlight its ability to provide a deep understanding of what makes a good narrative and how stories function. While primarily focused on screenwriting, many emphasize that its principles are universal and highly applicable to novels, stage plays, and other forms of fiction. The book is lauded for offering practical tools and a valuable perspective for writers to analyze and improve their work, helping them identify missing elements and solve structural problems. It delves into the fundamentals of story construction, emphasizing character development, plot mechanics, and the interconnectedness of narrative elements, moving beyond simple formulas to explore enduring artistic forms. Readers appreciate McKee's evident passion for storytelling and his clear articulation of complex ideas, covering concepts like effective symbolism, the power of "poetic expression," and the importance of writing from the "inside out."
Negatives Despite its many strengths, "Story" draws criticism for several aspects. A recurring complaint concerns the author's tone, which some reviewers describe as pompous, arrogant, or overly definitive, potentially stifling for insecure or novice writers. The book is also cited as verbose and, at times, poorly edited, with excessive preaching and long lists of film examples that can become tedious. Specific factual errors are noted, such as misremembered movie lines or incorrect cultural references, leading some to question the author's attention to detail. Several reviewers find McKee's views on modern film and contemporary society to be biased, outdated, and occasionally bizarre, suggesting a disdain for current artistic trends. Additionally, while the book excels at explaining structure and principles, some readers felt it lacked practical, step-by-step guidance for the actual process of turning an idea into a complete screenplay. A significant drawback for many is the book's tendency to extensively analyze film examples, often revealing major plot points without warning, which can spoil the viewing experience for those who haven't seen the movies discussed.
Conclusion Overall, "Story" is considered a foundational and invaluable resource for anyone serious about mastering narrative art, despite its acknowledged flaws. It is especially recommended for aspiring screenwriters, but novelists, playwrights, and even casual film enthusiasts will find significant value in its comprehensive exploration of storytelling principles. Readers should be prepared for a challenging and dense read, often requiring slow absorption and re-reading to fully grasp its concepts. The book is best approached as a guide to understanding the underlying mechanics of compelling narratives rather than a rigid set of rules or a quick-fix manual. While the film industry has evolved since its publication, the core insights provided are seen as timeless, offering a robust framework for crafting impactful stories that resonate with audiences and encouraging writers to engage in the hard, consistent work necessary for quality creation.