اصول شكسته نويسي

The book is widely praised for its pioneering effort to bring order and a systematic approach to the often chaotic practice of colloquial writing in Persian. Reviewers commend the author for addressing a significant challenge in contemporary Persian literature and translation. Key strengths highlighted include the introduction of novel concepts such as the distinction between the "syntax of speech" and the "syntax of writing," as well as a practical rule for colloquialization based on the number of syllables in words. Many readers, particularly writers and translators, found the book highly beneficial for clarifying their understanding of colloquial writing in dialogue, appreciating its concise nature and abundant examples. The book's emphasis on the role of visual memory in reading is also seen as a valuable insight, suggesting that excessive colloquialization can hinder reading speed. Overall, it is regarded as a significant contribution to the discussion, providing a much-needed framework for a complex linguistic issue.

Despite its positive contributions, the book faces several criticisms. A fundamental objection revolves around the concept of "colloquial reading," where the author suggests readers can mentally transform formally written words into their colloquial equivalents; many reviewers find this impractical and unrealistic. The proposed syllable-count rule, while innovative, is criticized for leading to an inconsistent blend of formal and colloquial words within the same text, creating an aesthetically displeasing and confusing reading experience. Critics also argue that the book insufficiently addresses the nuances of character voice and tone, which often necessitate specific colloquial forms regardless of syllable count. Some reviewers found the book repetitive, suggesting it could have been a more concise article rather than a full book. Additionally, concerns were raised about the author's prescriptive and sometimes dogmatic tone, as well as the lack of citations for certain claims. The applicability of the syllable rule to all words, especially nouns, and the perceived generational gap in the author's view on the acceptance of colloquial writing were also points of contention.

In conclusion, the book is considered a valuable, albeit imperfect, attempt to standardize colloquial writing in Persian. While it may not offer a definitive, universally applicable solution, it successfully initiates a crucial dialogue and provides a thoughtful framework for writers to consider. It is highly recommended for aspiring and established writers, translators, and editors who struggle with the inconsistencies of colloquialization in their works, or those who wish to refine their approach. The book serves as an excellent guide for those seeking to introduce more natural-sounding dialogue without resorting to excessive or jarring colloquial forms. However, readers who are already confident in their personal colloquial writing style might find some of its rules overly rigid or difficult to integrate. Ultimately, it encourages a more conscious and principled approach to colloquial writing, prompting all literary professionals to think more critically about how spoken language is represented in written form.